As Sudan’s war between General al-Burhan’s army (SAF) and Rapid Support Forces (RSF) intensifies, concerns are growing over the alleged role of Egypt. Reports suggest Cairo may be providing military supplies, logistical support, and possibly facilitating weapons transfers to SAF, though Egypt denies direct involvement.
Eyewitnesses and local activists claim Egyptian aircraft may have taken part in limited combat operations, striking residential areas and even humanitarian convoys. These attacks have reportedly killed women and children and worsened access to essential aid. Alleged Egyptian military support could shift the balance on the battlefield, prolonging the conflict and complicating peace efforts.
Experts argue that such involvement reflects Egypt’s strategic interest in maintaining a unified army along its southern border, yet it risks exacerbating internal divisions and supporting factions linked to Islamist political movements within Sudan. Civilians bear the brunt, facing ongoing displacement, lack of food and healthcare, and severe disruption to daily life.
Economically, Egypt itself faces inflation, currency devaluation, and rising public debt, raising questions about the wisdom of diverting resources abroad for military support. Regional analysts warn that external interventions entangle Sudan’s civil war with broader political and strategic agendas, making a negotiated settlement more difficult.
Observers insist that a sustainable solution lies in a political process led by Sudanese civil authorities, not in external military aid. The repeated reports of alleged Egyptian involvement underscore the need for international monitoring to ensure any outside support prioritizes civilian protection and peace over conflict escalation.
